By Kai Rebmann
He who flies high can also fall low! The bitter truth behind this truism is currently being felt by the so-called corona “vaccines” and their manufacturers. Initially hailed as a miracle cure for a new type of virus – there was talk of up to 100 percent protection against infection – Comirnaty and Co. became real bestsellers in the fall of 2023.
One of the last bastions of the vaccination lobby is the undaunted continued claim of protection against side effects and in particular Long Covid. However, as with practically all previously widespread narratives – effective, free of side effects, protection against severe courses of disease, etc. pp – this castle in the air also dissolves into thin air.
This is because there is simply no concrete or even approximate database on which to base this assertion. This is said by none other than the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the highest guardian of the Corona Grail.
As early as March 2023, a simple request was sent to the RKI via “FragdenStaat” within the framework of the Freedom of Information Act. An overview of the Long Covid patients recorded in Germany was requested, first broken down by vaccination status (vaccinated or unvaccinated) and then – in the case of the vaccinated – by the respective percentage of “basic vaccinated” and “boostered” patients.
No 'official information' available to RKI
To determine whether – and if so – to what extent the so-called “vaccination” protects against side effects, here Long Covid, the existence of these data is essential. The response from Berlin is all the more astonishing:
“The information requested by you is not available to the Robert Koch Institute as official information. The RKI’s reporting data do not include information on Long-Covid. The RKI is not aware of a register or a compilation of such data at the federal level.”
In other words: Not exact one does not know! Nevertheless, as early as March 24, 2022, German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach managed to claim the opposite in the Bundestag: “It is the vaccination that also provides the safest protection against Long Covid. We now have clear evidence, thank God, that the Long Covid risk, if you get infected but vaccinated, is significantly reduced.” At that time, however, “Us Karl” also affirmed that the “vaccination” was free of side effects…
But the contradictions do not end there. Also in March 2023, several media outlets celebrated “vaccination” as protection against Long Covid. For example, the “Spektrum der Wissenschaft” magazine stated: “Coronavirus: Vaccinated persons apparently fall ill less frequently with Long Covid”. Spiegel” wanted to know even more precisely: “Corona: Vaccination lowers risk of long covid by 40 percent”.
This sounds quite different in an RKI publication dated September 20, 2023, which discusses, among other things, “vaccination”-induced protection against Long Covid: “This question has not yet been clearly clarified scientifically.”
The following addendum almost seems like satire: “Based on current knowledge, the best way to prevent Long Covid is to avoid SARS-CoV-2 infection and reinfection by adhering to infection control measures.” Yes, if you don’t go into the water, you can’t get wet….
Long Covid vs. PostVac
In addition to the obvious lack of data, however, there is at least one other reason why the narrative of “vaccine protection” from Long Covid cannot hold up at all. To date, no clear distinction exists between symptoms caused by Long Covid on the one hand and Post Vac on the other.
The two are not the same, of course, but for politicians like Karl Lauterbach they are apparently the same nonetheless. Asked whether research distinguishes between the two disease patterns, the health minister responded during a press conference on Sept. 2, 2023: “If the clinical picture is a similar one, then it is not asked, was it now a vaccination or was it the disease.”
In plain language: Although not even the symptomatology of two very similar but nevertheless different clinical pictures has been clearly delineated, the “vaccination” continues to be advertised with, among other things, a supposedly reduced risk of contracting Long Covid.
And then the RKI stonewalls again...
Unfortunately, the RKI also seems to be willing only to disclose data that it is legally obligated to release. In an inquiry about the above request to “FragdenStaat”, with regard to the existing problem of distinguishability between Long Covid and Post Vac, it states:
“What about affected individuals who […] were vaccinated and still developed covid19? Therefore, the further question is how to determine what specifically triggered the Long Covid or Post Vac symptoms? And how do you expect to be able to even approximately assess the risk potential for Post Vac if you do not collect any data at all on a broad scale on Long Covid cases?”
The RKI’s telling answer (excerpt): “According to the regulations of the IFG [Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes], there is only a claim to access to official information, but not to answer one or more specific questions. In particular, the IFA does not contain a requirement for reasons, explanations, or opinions.”
Once again, the underpinning of a narrative spread by politics and the media in Germany fails due to a lack of data. And even more so because of the obvious lack of will to clarify open contradictions. What is the problem with answering one or more questions that seem legitimate – whether or not there is a formal legal right to do so?
Under fire – but all the more important is your support!
“Conspiracy ideologue,” “Nazi” or “right-wing agitator”: as a critical journalist today, you have to constantly have dirt thrown at you. The public broadcasters are particularly active in this area. ARD’s chief fact-finder Gensing already sued me in 2019, and the Böhmermann broadcaster ZDF recently slandered me as a “propagator of conspiracy narratives” – without naming a single piece of evidence, and in a post full of lies. Springer journalist Gabor Steingardt slandered me in “Focus,” for which I worked for 16 years, as a “member of an army of tin soldiers” and a “media fighting machine” of the AfD. On the initiative of “Westdeutscher Rundfunk,” I was even put on the wanted list. If one defends oneself legally, one usually has to bear the costs oneself. Your support is all the more important. Also morally. It spurs you on to keep going and not give up. Thank you very much for making my work possible with your contribution – without compulsory fees and tax money.
Currently (again) donations via credit card, Apple Pay etc. are possible – despite the Paypal block: via this link. Alternatively via bank transfer, IBAN: DE30 6805 1207 0000 3701 71. For those who have little themselves, I expressly ask you to keep what little you have. I am all the more pleased to receive support from all those whom it does not hurt.
My current video
EXCLUSIVE: Why doctor Habig preferred to go to prison than to vaccinate: “Top priority not to harm patients!”
Contributions marked by name always reflect the opinion of the author, not mine. I value my readers as adults and want to offer them different points of view so they can form their own opinions.
Kai Rebmann is a publicist and publisher. He manages a publishing company and runs his own blog.
Image: D Busquets/ShutterstockMore from Kai Rebmann at reitschuster.de
